—

Mag Pulse · daily board · the Six plus the Torque · as of Nov 10, 2026

Mag Pulse

One question, answered daily: is the hyperscaler cohort turning? The Mag complex spent ~19 months going sideways on capex fear while nearly every benchmark ran. This week's cloud prints put booked demand against that fear — this board keeps the score. Six names in three cohorts, one torque row, and the popular instrument (MAGS) as the shared price frame. Tesla is excluded by methodology.

The regime-turn line Hyperscalers ÷ Consumer-AI · equal-weight · indexed 1y

0.951.111.26 25-1226-0326-0626-09 0.99
1D +0.13%1W -0.18%1M -3.84%1Y -10.37%

Rising = the market pays the build-out cohort over the consumer-AI cohort. The line is the board's headline read: a durable turn here is what "the discount is closing" looks like in price.

The MAGS map popular-instrument foil · standing levels

69.50 shelf 62.56 pivot ~56 trend 25-1226-0326-0626-09 68.55
Close 68.55 to 69.50 +1.39% to 62.56 -8.74% to ~56 -18.31%

Ten-month compression: flat top at the 69.50 supply shelf (two rejections), rising floor on the multi-year trendline (~56, hand-set monthly), pivot 62.56 = the Dec-2024 top on price. Levels first, story second.

The cohorts

Hyperscalers
1D -0.27%1W +4.19%1M -7.74%1Y +6.76%
1Y vs QQQ: -4.42%

MSFT · AMZN · GOOGL — the thesis longs: does the cohort close the gap?

Consumer-AI
1D -0.40%1W +4.38%1M -4.06%1Y +19.11%
1Y vs QQQ: +7.93%

META · AAPL — not yet in the build-out cycle; edge-AI optionality

Supplier
1D -5.47%1W -18.29%1M -25.38%1Y -10.12%
1Y vs QQQ: -21.30%

NVDA — the anchor between build-out and deployment

Torque
1D -1.51%1W -6.51%1M -14.13%1Y -50.39%
1Y vs QQQ: -61.57%

ORCL — highest-beta hyperscaler pivot; thesis amplifier both ways

The Six absolute + relative, Nov 10, 2026 close

Name Cohort Close 1D1W1M1Y 1Y vs QQQ 1Y vs MAGS Record
MSFT Hyperscalers 533.16 -2.20%+2.34%-1.48%+7.76% -3.42% +1.81% print record
AMZN Hyperscalers 270.87 +1.48%+8.05%+4.37%+10.83% -0.35% +4.88% print record
GOOGL Hyperscalers 287.38 -0.27%+2.62%-18.52%+3.21% -7.97% -2.74% print record
META Consumer-AI 641.39 +0.00%+3.28%-13.67%+3.34% -7.84% -2.61% print record
AAPL Consumer-AI 348.51 -0.62%+5.00%+2.21%+30.06% +18.88% +24.11% print record
NVDA Supplier 168.89 -5.47%-18.29%-25.38%-10.12% -21.30% -16.07% print record

The Torque · ORCL separated by design — the thesis amplifier, both ways

Close 117.98 1D -1.51% · 1W -6.51% · 1M -14.13% · 1Y -50.39%
Below the Sep-2025 high -63.66% high 324.63 on 2025-09-10 — the deepest drawdown in the complex
1M realized vol 78.8% cohort median 42.5% — the most volatile seat at the table

The torque: hyperscaler-since-recently, declined the most, most volatile in both directions. If the thesis holds, the biggest move lives here.

Benchmarks the field the Six are measured against

Instrument Close 1D1W1M1Y
QQQ 674.76 -0.68%-1.54%-9.55%+11.18%
SPY 749.92 -0.37%-0.59%-3.62%+12.97%
SOXX 146.59 -0.12%-5.43%-19.29%+49.87%
XLK 168.91 -1.15%-4.31%-13.98%+17.83%
IGV 100.33 -1.11%-2.27%-9.84%-8.34%
MAGS · the foil 68.55 -0.78%-0.28%-7.34%+5.95%

The thesis layer the standing read per name — editorial, updated on evidence

MSFT

The capex-fear discount, refuted where it was priced deepest: Azure +43%, $678B backlog — the market paid the print +15% in a day.

AMZN

AWS re-accelerated to +37% — the demand witness. The biggest print reaction in its record parked it directly under the all-time-high line.

GOOGL

The straddle: cloud yes, search disruption already visible — and AI replacement monetizes less well. Re-rated in sympathy without printing.

META

Excellent at AI-for-ads — but that is not genAI. Charged hardest of the Six for strategy-push capex without a booked-demand anchor.

AAPL

Waiting to monetize reach, with the tail risk that a new AI interface takes reach away from mobile. The cost repricing hit its margin story first.

NVDA

The supplier both cohorts pay either way — priced on workloads, not orders; the boundary name between build-out and deployment.

Methodology

Universe: six Mag names in three cohorts — Hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL), Consumer-AI (META, AAPL), Supplier (NVDA) — plus Oracle as a visually separated torque row. Tesla is excluded by stated methodology: not a Mag company for this monitor — its price is set by autonomy and robotics narratives, not by the cloud/AI build-out economics this board measures.

Computation: cohort composites are equal-weight within cohort. All windows (1D/1W/1M/1Y) are trading-day windows on adjusted closes. Relatives are simple return differences against each benchmark (QQQ, SPY, SOXX, XLK, IGV) plus MAGS as the popular-instrument foil. The headline line is the hyperscaler composite divided by the consumer-AI composite, indexed over one year — the regime-turn detector.

The MAGS map is a standing frame, not a computed one: the 69.50 supply shelf and 62.56 pivot (the Dec-17-2024 top on price basis) are fixed levels; the multi-year trendline (~56) is hand-set and updated monthly.

Data: equities from the Closelooknet data lake; benchmark ETFs from EODHD. Refreshed nightly after the US close (22:30 UTC, Mon–Fri).

This board is a diary entry on our process. Closelooknet publishes research, not investment advice.

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-11-10

Quick answers

What does Mag Pulse track?

Mag Pulse is a daily board on six "Mag" companies split into three cohorts — Hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL), Consumer-AI (META, AAPL) and Supplier (NVDA) — plus Oracle tracked separately as a high-beta "torque" name. Tesla is excluded by methodology: its price is driven by autonomy and robotics narratives, not cloud/AI build-out economics. See the Capex Cliff 101 for the thesis behind the board. As of Nov 10, 2026.

How has the Hyperscalers-versus-Consumer-AI ratio moved over the past year?

As of Nov 10, 2026, the equal-weight Hyperscalers ÷ Consumer-AI ratio moved -10.37% over the trailing year (1D +0.13%, 1M -3.84%). A rising ratio means the market is paying the build-out cohort over the consumer-AI cohort — the board's regime-turn detector.

Which of the Six has performed best and worst over the past year?

As of Nov 10, 2026, the strongest 1-year performer among the Six is AAPL at +30.06%, and the weakest is NVDA at -10.12%.

Where does MAGS trade relative to its key levels?

MAGS closed at 68.55 as of Nov 10, 2026, which is +1.39% from the 69.50 supply shelf, -8.74% from the 62.56 pivot, and -18.31% from the ~56 trendline.

How volatile is ORCL relative to the rest of the cohort?

As of Nov 10, 2026, ORCL's one-month realized volatility was 78.8%, versus a cohort median of 42.5% — the most volatile seat at the table. ORCL is -63.66% below its Sep-2025 high of 324.63 (set 2025-09-10).