—

Cia de Distribucion Integral (LOG.MC) — the peer cohort

As of 2026-10-15 — scores re-bake nightly. Cohort = shared Closelooknet index membership first, then sector. Diary readings, not advice.

Cia de Distribucion Integral ranks 6 of 13 in its cohort on the Closelooknet composite (58/100) — the cohort is led by Wolters Kluwer N.V. at 61/100.

NameCompositeMomentumQualityValuationSignalOff 52w high
LOG.MC Cia de Distribucion Integral 58 75 46 80 ok 1%
ZTO ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc 60 21 53 86 warn 22.9%
INPST.AS Inpost SA 47 61 35 59 info 2.5%
STF.PA Stef SA 42 57 21 76 info 12%
DSV.CO DSV A/S 38 9 23 50 bear 39.3%
PSG.MC Prosegur 53 70 36 87 ok 6.9%
ENO.MC Elecnor S.A 50 18 43 75 info 30.7%
FCC.MC Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA 49 33 38 61 info 21.1%
GRE.MC Grenergy Renovables S.A 49 4 45 44 warn 51.5%
WKL.AS Wolters Kluwer N.V. 61 61 83 74 neutral 33.5%
WOSB.DE Wolters Kluwers Nv 61 64 85 66 info 26.3%
NDSN Nordson Corporation 60 81 69 32 neutral 3.1%
SUNB Sunbelt Rentals Holdings, Inc. 60 64 64 60 — —

Scores are relative readings across the Closelooknet coverage universe — methodology in the company-scoring explainer. Signal lights come from the nightly signal board.

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-10-15

Quick answers

Who are Cia de Distribucion Integral's peers in the Closelooknet universe?

The cohort is drawn from shared Closelooknet index membership first, then sector: ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc (ZTO), Inpost SA (INPST.AS), Stef SA (STF.PA), DSV A/S (DSV.CO), Prosegur (PSG.MC), Elecnor S.A (ENO.MC), Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA (FCC.MC), Grenergy Renovables S.A (GRE.MC) and others.

How does LOG.MC score against its peers?

Cia de Distribucion Integral's composite reads 58/100, ranking 6 of 13 in its cohort as of 2026-10-15; the cohort's highest composite is Wolters Kluwer N.V. at 61/100. Closelooknet scores are research diary readings, not ratings or advice.

Related in the Closelooknet universe

then Integrated Freight & Logistics, then Industrials. Scored names rank on their Closelooknet score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.